High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4.00pm on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the  High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026.If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd and Anor v. Australian Competition Tribunal and Ors

Case No. M155/2011; M156/2011; M157/2011
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

04/05/2011 Federal Court of Australia (Keane CJ, Mansfield & Middleton JJ)

[2011] FCAFC 58

Catchwords

Competition law — Declared services — Rio Tinto Ltd and associated entities ("Rio") operate Hamersley and Robe railway lines in Pilbara region — The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd ("TPI") applied for declarations to allow third party trains and rolling stock to move along Hamersley and Robe lines — Commonwealth Treasurer declared Hamersley and Robe lines for period of 20 years pursuant to s 44H of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (now Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ("Act") — Australian Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") made determination, pursuant to s 44K(7) of Act, setting aside Hamersley declaration and varying Robe declaration to ten year period — Tribunal found, inter alia, that Hamersley and Robe lines are natural monopolies, but access would be, by reason of putative benefits associated with construction of alternate railway lines and cost to Rio and therefore national economy, contrary to public interest — Full Court of Federal Court upheld Tribunal's decision in respect of Hamersley line and set aside limited declaration in respect of Robe line — Whether criterion for declaration of service specified in s 44H(4)(b) of Act imposes test of private profitability or test applying economic principles taking into account natural monopoly characteristics — Whether public interest criterion in s 44H(4)(f) of Act requires or permits inquiry into likely net balance of social costs and benefits if declaration made — Whether s 44H of Act confers broad discretion on Minister to conduct social cost-benefit analysis if prescribed matters in s 44H point in favour of declaration being made — Whether Minister's discretion confined to matters within purpose and object of s 44H — Whether open to National Competition Council to recommend Hamersley and Robe line services be subject of declaration under s 44H of Act.

Words and phrases — "uneconomical for anyone to develop another facility to provide the service".

Short Particulars

Documents

28/10/2011 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)

11/11/2011 Notice of appeal

25/11/2011 Written submissions (Appellants)

25/11/2011 Chronology (Appellants)

02/12/2011 Written submissions (National Competition Council - seeking leave to intervene)

15/12/2011 Written submissions (Respondents - Rio Tinto parties)

15/12/2011 Written submissions (Respondents - BHP parties)

22/12/2011 Reply (M155/2011)

22/12/2011 Reply (M156-157/2011)

06/03/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

07/03/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

08/03/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

22/03/2012 Supplementary submissions (Appellants)

05/04/2012 Supplementary submissions (Respondents - Rio Tinto parties)

05/04/2012 Supplementary submissions (Respondents - BHP parties)

12/04/2012 Supplementary submissions (National Competition Council intervening)

19/04/2012 Supplementary reply (Appellants)

14/09/2012 Judgment  (Judgment summary)