High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4.00pm on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the  High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm AEDT on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026.If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v. Nicholls and Ors

Case No. S67/2011
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

15/09/2010 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal)(Basten JA, Young JA, Lindgren AJA)

[2010] NSWCA 222

Catchwords

Practice and procedure — Supreme Court procedure — Abuse of process — Applicant obtained judgment against respondents in New South Wales Supreme Court ("NSWSC") for knowing participation in breach of fiduciary duty by a non-party — London arbitrators subsequently issued interim award upholding breach of duties by non-party but denying compensation to applicant ("the Award") — Respondents not party to the Award — Whether abuse of process for applicant to seek to enforce judgment in NSWSC in face of the Award.

Practice and procedure — Courts and judges — Disqualification of judges for interest or bias — Apprehended bias — Application of lay observer test in Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 — Whether lay observer test "unnecessary" and "wholly artificial" where judge personally apprehends bias — Whether conclusion of New South Wales Court of Appeal on trial judge's apprehensible bias justified on facts.

Practice and procedure — Waiver — Trial judge refused to recuse himself ("the recusal decision") and invited respondents to appeal the recusal decision — Respondents did not appeal the recusal decision until after trial and judgment adverse to respondents delivered — Whether the recusal decision an order or judgment —Whether the recusal decision amenable to appeal — Whether respondents waived right to appeal the recusal decision by proceeding with trial.

Short particulars

Documents

11/02/2011 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

25/02/2011 Notice of appeal

11/03/2011 Written submissions (Appellant)

11/03/2011 Chronology (Appellant)

08/04/2011 Written submissions (Respondents)

08/04/2011 Chronology (Respondents)

15/04/2011 Reply

31/05/2011 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

01/06/2011 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

06/06/2011 Supplementary submissions (Appellant)

16/06/2011 Submissions in reply (Respondents)

01/12/2011 Judgment  (Judgment summary)