Please be advised that the High Court building in Canberra will be closed to the public for an event from Wednesday, 19 November to Friday, 21 November 2025.

Huynh v. The Queen

Case No. A30/2012
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

31/08/2011 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Doyle CJ, Vanstone J, Peek J)

[2011] SASFC 100

Catchwords

Criminal law – Appeal – Jury misdirection – Applicant and co-accused convicted of murder after trial before jury – Trial judge provided written directions on request from jury – Trial judge’s directions omitted element of joint enterprise liability and failed to apply substituted legal directions to the evidence against the applicant – Whether appellate court able to conclude no substantial miscarriage of justice.

Short Particulars

Documents

07/09/2012 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by v/link from Adelaide)

21/09/2012 Notice of appeal

02/10/2012 Written submissions (Appellant)

08/10/2012 Chronology (Appellant)

15/11/2012 Written submissions (Respondent)

23/11/2012 Reply

05/12/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

06/12/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

13/03/2013 Judgment  (Judgment summary)