Huynh v. The Queen
Case No.
A30/2012
Related matters:
A31/2012 - Duong v. The Queen
A32/2012 - Sem v. The Queen
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
31/08/2011 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Doyle CJ, Vanstone J, Peek J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Appeal – Jury misdirection – Applicant and co-accused convicted of murder after trial before jury – Trial judge provided written directions on request from jury – Trial judge’s directions omitted element of joint enterprise liability and failed to apply substituted legal directions to the evidence against the applicant – Whether appellate court able to conclude no substantial miscarriage of justice.
Documents
07/09/2012 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by v/link from Adelaide)
21/09/2012 Notice of appeal
02/10/2012 Written submissions (Appellant)
02/10/2012 Chronology (Appellant)
15/11/2012 Written submissions (Respondent)
23/11/2012 Reply
05/12/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
06/12/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
13/03/2013 Judgment (Judgment summary)