Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v. Keating

Case No. M5/2013
Case information

Catchwords

Constitutional law – Powers of the Commonwealth Parliament – Social Security Legislation – Retrospective application of offence – Section 66A of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) ('the Administration Act') retrospectively creates duty for applicant to inform Centrelink of income increases – Applicant charged with three counts of obtaining financial advantage contrary to s 135(1) for failing to report increases in her income to Centrelink – Whether s 66A of the Administration Act invalid in so far as it operates retrospectively – Whether the sending or deemed receipt of a notice under s 68 of the Administration Act is sufficient to give rise to a duty under law to perform an action for the purposes of s 4.3(b) of the Criminal Code (Cth).

Short Particulars

Documents

14/12/2012 Hearing (Removal, Melbourne)

18/12/2012 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne)

02/01/2013 Cause removed

02/01/2013 Case stated

27/02/2013 Written submissions (Keating)

21/03/2013 Written submissions (DPP)

21/03/2013 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)

26/03/2013 Reply

27/03/2013 Written submissions - Amended (Attorney-General of the Commonweath intervening)

03/04/2013 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

08/05/2013 Judgment  (Judgment summary)