High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4.00pm on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the  High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026.If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease IMT 2 (HP) Pty Ltd
Commissioner of State Revenue v. Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited

Case No. M74/2014 to M81/2014
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

15/08/2013 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Warren CJ, Tate JA & Kyrou AJA)

[2013] VSCA 207

Catchwords

Stamp duty – Consideration for dutiable transaction – Identification of consideration for dutiable transactions in circumstances where purchaser of dutiable property promises to make series of different payments at different times and where promises are contained in multiple instruments – Seven parcels of land were transferred according to multiple instruments – Whether consideration for dutiable transaction should be identified by instruments which effect dutiable transaction and consideration expressed in each instrument and/or by asking whether given instrument is correct instrument – Whether s 20 of Duties Act 2000 (Vic) should be construed as limited to promises if and insofar as they moved transfer of dutiable property in condition it was at time of transfer.

Short Particulars

Documents

 15/08/2014 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)

 28/08/2014 Notice of appeal

 19/09/2014 Written submissions (Appellant)

 19/09/2014 Chronology (Appellant)

 10/10/2014 Written submissions (Respondents)

 24/10/2014 Reply

04/11/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

05/11/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

10/12/2014 Judgment (Judgment summary)