Please be advised that the High Court building in Canberra will be closed to the public for an event from Wednesday, 19 November to Friday, 21 November 2025.

Munda v. The State of Western Australia

Case No. P34/2013
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

22/08/2012 Supreme Court of Western Australia (Court of Appeal) (McLure J, Buss J, Mazza J)

[2012] WASCA 164

Catchwords

Criminal law – Sentencing – Residual discretion – Principles which govern the operation of residual discretion – Appellant found guilty of unlawful killing of de facto wife – Sentenced to 5 years and 3 months imprisonment – Court of Appeal allowed Crown appeal and increased sentence to 7 years and 9 months – Court of Appeal accepted that it had a residual discretion to disallow a prosecution appeal against sentence but chose not to exercise it – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding that residual discretion should only be exercised where parity considerations arise.

Criminal law – Sentencing – Fernando considerations – Whether Court of Appeal erred in its application of the Fernando principles.

Criminal law – Sentencing – Manifest inadequacy – Whether prosecution appeal contending manifest inadequacy is a proper occasion for an intermediate court to review the appropriateness of a sentencing range.

Short Particulars

Documents

06/06/2013 Hearing (SLA, Canberra v/link to Perth)

20/06/2013 Notice of appeal

04/07/2013 Written submissions (Appellant)

04/07/2013 Chronology (Appellant)

22/07/2013 Written submissions (Respondent)

29/07/2013 Reply

06/08/2013 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

02/10/2013 Judgment  (Judgment summary)