Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: RP v. The Queen

Date: 08 November 2016

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 2h 35m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Plaintiff M96A/2016 & Anor v. Commonwealth of Australia & Anor

Case No.

M96/2016

Case Information

Catchwords

Plaintiffs from Iran - arrived on Christmas island in 2013 - taken to Nauru where detained pursuant to regional processing arrangements - November 2014 brought to Australia under s198B Migration Act for "temporary purpose" ie medical treatment - plaintiffs challenge validity of detention in Australia since 2014 - whether detention in Australia validly authorised by ss189 and 196 Migration - whether ss189 & 196 are beyond constitutional power

Short particulars

Documents

15/07/2016 Application for an order to show cause

04/08/2016 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)

14/09/2016 Consent as to directions

20/10/2016 Demurrer (Defendants)

02/11/2016 Order by consent referring Demurrer to Full Court

28/11/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)

28/11/2016 Chronology

20/12/2016 Written submissions (Defendants)

27/01/2017 Reply

14/02/2017 Consent order amending title of proceeding

21/02/2017 Amended Demurrer

01/03/2017 Amended written submissions (Plaintiffs)

01/03/2017 Amended reply

03/03/2017 Amended written submissions (Defendants)

08/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

03/05/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Van Ryn v. The Queen

Case No.

S250/2016

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

10/02/2016 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Leeming JA, Johnson J, R A Hulme J)

[2016] NSWCCA 1

Catchwords

Criminal law – Sentencing – Where appellant pleaded guilty to multiple child sexual assault offences against nine victims – Where Court of Appeal erred in determining an aggregate sentence on the basis that Count 9 of the first indictment was an offence contrary to s 61M(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – Where Count 9 was an offence under s 61M(1) – Where s 61M(1) and s 61M(2) have different maximum sentences.

Documents

14/10/2016 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

28/10/2016 Notice of appeal

11/11/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

Smith v. The Queen

Case No.

S249/2016

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

20/05/2016 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Beazley P, Harrison J, R A Hulme J)

[2016] NSWCCA 93

Catchwords

Criminal law – Criminal Code (Cth) s 307.1 – Intention – Factual inferential reasoning – Application of Kural v The Queen (1987) 162 CLR 502 – Whether “awareness of the likelihood” can be used to establish intention under the Criminal Code (Cth).

Short Particulars

Documents

14/10/2016 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

26/10/2016 Notice of appeal

18/11/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)

18/11/2016 Chronology (Appellant)

09/12/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)

19/12/2016 Reply

28/02/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

10/05/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)

PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd  v. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Case No.

S248/2016

Related matter:

S245/2016 – Air New Zealand Ltd  v. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

30/03/2016 Federal Court of Australia (Dowsett, Yates, Edelman JJ)

[2016] FCAFC 42

Catchwords

Competition – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – Price fixing – s 4E of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – Meaning of a market “in Australia” – Whether markets for airborne cargo out of Hong Kong, Singapore and Indonesia to ports in Australia were markets “in Australia”.

Short particulars

Documents

14/10/2016 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

21/10/2016 Notice of appeal

18/11/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)

18/11/2016 Chronology (Appellant)

09/12/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)

21/12/2016 Reply

02/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

03/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

14/06/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Page 150 of 258