Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Smith v. Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services & Ors

Case No. B58/2026
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

29/05/2026 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Mullins P, Brown and Bradley JJA)

[2026] QCA 99 

Catchwords

Statutory interpretation – Human Rights – s 22 of the Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) – where the appellant is a prisoner who will be 39 years old if released at the date fixed for her eligibility for parole and 41 years old at the end of her sentence – where the appellant applied to undergo a process of egg extraction and freezing under s 22 – meaning of assisted reproductive technology – whether egg extraction and freezing is participating in assisted reproductive technology under s 22 – whether the Court of Appeal should have considered the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) at the outset of interpreting s 22 – whether the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of s 22 should be compatible with human rights pursuant to s 8 of the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld)

Case Summary

Download a brief summary of the case

Documents
06/08/2026 Determination
12/08/2026 Notice of appeal
19/08/2026
19/08/2026
31/08/2026
31/08/2026
31/08/2026
07/09/2026
Reply (Appellant) (513.11 KB)
17/09/2026 Hearing [2026] HCATrans 051 (Full Court, Canberra)
17/09/2026
17/09/2026
17/09/2026
17/09/2026
Case recording