The King v. Tsalkos
Lower Court Judgment
19/12/2024 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Emerton P; Priest, McLeish, Niall and Boyce JJA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – evidence – where respondent convicted of rape with aggravating circumstances, kidnapping and gross indecency with a person under 16 - evidence given of complainant’s representation to another person of having been sexually assaulted – evidence led that complainant was distressed when making representation – where Court of Appeal allowed appeal and held trial Judge’s invitation to jury to use complainant’s distress as independent evidence caused substantial miscarriage of justice – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding evidence of distress not capable of being used as independent evidence without direct or causal connection between distress and alleged offending.
Download this detailed case study to gain deeper insights.
| 07/08/2025 | Determination |
| 13/08/2025 | Notice of appeal |
| 04/09/2025 |
Written submissions (Appellant)
(468.67 KB)
|
| 04/09/2025 |
Chronology (Appellant)
(231.06 KB)
|
| 18/09/2025 |
Written submissions (Respondent)
(418.04 KB)
|
| 25/09/2025 |
Reply
(389.58 KB)
|
| 17/10/2025 | Hearing: [2025] HCATrans 071 (Full Court, Canberra) |
| 17/10/2025 |
Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
(437.95 KB)
|
| 17/10/2025 |
Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
(374.45 KB)
|