Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Hamra v. The Queen

Case No. A14/2017
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

8/12/2016 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Kelly J, Peek J, Nicholson J & Lovell J)

[2016] SASCFC 130

Catchwords

Criminal law – Persistent sexual exploitation of child under Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 50 – Where trial judge held no case to answer because allegations of generalised nature such that it was not possible to identify two or more proved sexual offences within meaning of s 50 – Where Court of Criminal Appeal quashed acquittal and remitted matter for retrial – Whether s 50 requires proof of commission of two or more prescribed sexual offences on particular occasions – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal failed to address appellant’s submission that respondent’s appeal should not be granted having regard to considerations relating to double jeopardy.

Short particulars

Documents

07/04/2017 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)

21/04/2017 Notice of appeal

21/04/2017 Notice of contention (Respondent)

12/05/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

12/05/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

29/05/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)

05/06/2017 Reply

20/06/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Adelaide)

21/06/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Adelaide)

13/09/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)