High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4.00pm on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the  High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026.If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

Stanley v. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) & Anor

Case No. S126/2022
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

21/12/2021 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal) (Bell P, Basten, Leeming, McCallum and Beech-Jones JJA)

[2021] NSWCA 337

Catchwords

Administrative law – Judicial review – Jurisdictional error – Where District Court's exercise of sentencing discretion governed by Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ("CSP") – Where s 7 of CSP provides court that sentenced offender to imprisonment may make intensive correction order ("ICO") – Where, when considering making ICO, Part 5 of CSP applies, including s 66 which provides "[c]ommunity safety must be paramount consideration" when sentencing court is deciding whether to make ICO – Where s 66(2) requires sentencing court to assess whether making order or serving sentence more likely to address offender's risk of reoffending – Whether failure to comply with s 66(2) of CSP constitutes jurisdictional error – Whether statutory requirement that matter be considered is jurisdictional/mandatory if power being exercised is part of sentencing process undertaken by court – Whether statutory requirement that matter be considered is not jurisdictional if failure to comply cannot be characterised as fundamentally misconceiving sentencing function – Whether "complex" consequences of finding criminal sentence invalid weigh significantly against finding statutory requirement intended to be jurisdictional/mandatory.

Documents

19/08/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by remote connection)

31/08/2022 Notice of appeal

06/09/2022 Order amending title of matter by consent

16/09/2022 Written submissions (Appellant)

15/09/2022 Chronology (Appellant)

14/10/2022 Written submissions (First Respondent)

21/10/2022 Reply

15/11/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
           (Pronouncement of orders included)

15/11/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

15/11/2022 Outline of oral argument (First Respondent)

15/02/2023 Judgment (Judgment summary)