Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Quinn v. The Queen

Case No. S143/2011
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

17/12/2010 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Allsop P, McClellan CJatCL, Hulme J, Latham J, McCallum J)

[2010] NSWCCA 313

Catchwords

Criminal law — Sentencing — Applicants pleaded guilty to cultivation of large commercial quantity of cannabis — Crown appealed against inadequacy of applicants' sentences — Where no appeal instituted against sentence of another participant who pleaded guilty to taking part in supply of commercial quantity of cannabis — Where NSW Court of Criminal Appeal increased applicants' sentences — Whether sentence which at first instance achieves parity with sentence imposed on co-offender can be regarded as manifestly inadequate — Whether open to intermediate appellate court to increase sentence when increase will engender sentencing disparity — Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s23(2)(a); Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D; Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Div 1A.

Short Particulars

Documents

08/04/2011 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

19/04/2011 Notice of appeal

13/05/2011 Written submissions (Appellant)

13/05/2011 Chronology

03/06/2011 Written submissions (Respondent)

14/06/2011 Reply

24/06/2011 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

03/08/2011 Pronouncement of Orders (Reasons to be published later)

06/12/2011 Judgment  (Judgment summary)