Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Fairbairn v. Radecki

Case No. S179/2021
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

11/12/2020 Family Court of Australia (Ainsley-Wallace, Ryan & Aldridge JJ)

[2020] FamCAFC 307

Catchwords

Family law – De-facto relationship – Breakdown – Proper test for determination of breakdown of de-facto relationship – Where s 90SM of Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) provided, in property settlement proceedings after breakdown of de-facto relationship, court may make order altering interest of parties to de-facto relationship in property – Where, in 2005 or 2006, applicant and respondent entered into de-facto relationship – Where basis of relationship living together on domestic basis with clear understanding as to separation of each other’s financial affairs and property interests – Where, in 2015, applicant began to suffer from rapid cognitive decline – Where applicant incapable of managing own affairs and, in 2018, New South Wales Trustee & Guardian appointed to act for applicant – Where Public Guardian placed applicant into aged care facility – Where respondent did not provide financial support for applicant, continued to reside in applicant’s property and prevented Trustee from selling applicant’s property – Where Trustee commenced proceedings against respondent in Federal Circuit Court seeking order for property settlement pursuant to s 90SM, claiming applicant and respondent’s de-facto relationship had broken down – Where primary judge declared de-facto relationship had broken down no later than 25 May 2018 – Where respondent successfully appealed to Full Family Court – Whether basis of applicant and respondent’s de-facto relationship no longer existed – Whether de-facto relationship had broken down.

Documents

15/10/2021 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by video connection)

29/10/2021 Notice of appeal

03/12/2021 Written submissions (Appellant)

03/12/2021 Chronology (Appellant)

14/01/2022 Written submissions (Respondent)

04/02/2022 Reply

08/03/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

08/03/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

08/03/2022 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)

11/05/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)