Please be advised that the High Court building in Canberra will be closed to the public for an event from Wednesday, 19 November to Friday, 21 November 2025.

D'Arcy v. Myriad Genetics Inc & Anor

Case No. S28/2015
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

5/09/2014 Federal Court of Australia (Allsop CJ, Dowsett J, Kenny J, Bennett J, Middleton J)

[2014] FCAFC 115

Catchwords

Intellectual Property – Patents – Requirements for a valid patent – Human beings and their biological processes – s 18(1)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – Where appellant submitted that the Full Court of the Federal Court erred in holding that each of claims 1 -3 of Australian Patent No 686004 claimed a patentable invention being a manner of manufacture – Australian Patent No 686004 is described as the identification of “a human breast and ovarian cancer disposing gene (BRCA1)” – Whether claims 1 – 3, which relate to isolated nucleic acid, are claims for a manner of manufacture for the purposes of s 18(1)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth).

Short Particulars

Documents

13/02/2015 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)

27/02/2015 Notice of appeal

10/03/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)

10/03/2015 Chronology (Appellant)

13/03/2015 Summons seeking leave to intervene as amicus curiae (Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia - seeking leave to intervene)

24/03/2015 Written submissions (First Respondent)

31/03/2015 Notice of Constitutional Matter (Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia)

31/03/2015 Written submissions (Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia - seeking leave to intervene)

07/04/2015 Reply

26/05/2015 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

16/06/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

17/06/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

07/10/2015 Judgment (Judgment summary)