DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Realestate.com.au Pty Ltd v. Hardingham & Ors
RP Data Pty Limited v. Hardingham & Ors

Case No. S57 and S58/2022
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

18/08/2021 Federal Court of Australia (Greenwood, Rares and Jackson JJ)

[2021] FCAFC 148

Catchwords

Copyright – Informal oral agreements – Inferred term – Implied term – Where Hardingham professional photographer and sole director of Real Estate Marketing Australia Pty Ltd ("REMA") – Where REMA commissioned by agencies to take photographs and prepare floor plans of properties for use on platforms concerning marketing of properties for sale or lease – Where retainer of Hardingham and REMA by agencies oral, informal and said nothing of copyright in photographs and floorplans – Where Hardingham entered into "deed of licence" with REMA by which Hardingham granted REMA exclusive licence of copyright subsisting in works originated by him – Where photographs and floor plans provided to each agency were uploaded to platform realestate.com.au operated by Realestate.com.au Pty Ltd ("REA") – Where, to list property on platform, agency had to hold real estate licence and enter subscription agreement which prescribed Terms and Conditions ("T&C") as part of agreement – Where T&C provided that agency granted licence to REA to use and adapt content provided by agency – Where s 15 of Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) provided "act shall be deemed to have been done with licence of copyright owner if doing of act was authorized by a licence binding copyright owner – Whether, in informal agreement under which owner of copyright in works intends to grant another person licence to use works, including right to grant sub-licence to third party, it is necessary for licensor and licensee to know precise terms of grant by sub-licence – Whether, for purposes of engaging s 15 of Copyright Act, it is necessary to show what licence binding on owner allowed, and whether infringer acted consistently with licence.

Documents

12/04/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by remote connection)

26/04/2022 Notices of appeal

31/05/2022 Written submissions (Appellant in S57/2022)

31/05/2022 Chronology (Appellant in S57/2022)

31/05/2022 Written submissions (Appellant in S58/2022)

31/05/2022 Chronology (Appellant in S58/2022)

28/06/2022 Written submissions (Third Respondent in S57/2022)

28/06/2022 Written submissions (Third Respondent in S58/2022)

14/07/2022 Written submissions (First and Second Respondents jointly for both matters)

01/08/2022 Reply (Appellant in S58/2022)

05/08/2022 Reply (Appellant in S57/2022)

11/10/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

11/10/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant in S57/2022)

11/10/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant in S58/2022)

11/10/2022 Outline of oral argument (First and Second Respondents jointly for both matters)

14/12/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)