Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Bugmy v The Queen

[2013] HCA 37
Judgment date
Case number
S99/2013
Before
French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler, Keane JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where sole ground of appeal manifest inadequacy – Where appellate court increased offender's sentence – Whether finding of manifest inadequacy required before discretion to vary sentence enlivened.

Criminal law – Sentence – Principles – Relevance of deprived background of Aboriginal offender – Application of Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 – Whether effect of social deprivation diminishes with time and repeat offending – Whether social deprivation has same mitigatory effect for all purposes of punishment – Whether courts should take into account unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders and high rate of incarceration of Aboriginal Australians when sentencing Aboriginal offender – Whether approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Gladue [1999] 1 SCR 688 and R v Ipeelee [2012] 1 SCR 433 should be followed.

Words and phrases – "deprived background", "Fernando considerations", "manifestly inadequate", "residual discretion".

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 5(1).

Files
37.rtf (231.26 KB)
37.pdf (92.2 KB)