DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Adam v The Queen

[2001] HCA 57
Judgment date
Case number
S139/2000
Before
Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Kirby, Hayne JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Evidence - Whether trial judge erred in admitting prior inconsistent statements of prosecution witness - Relevance of prior inconsistent statements - Application of credibility rule - Exceptions to hearsay rule - Prior inconsistent statements as evidence of the truth of the representations.

Criminal law – Evidence - Unfavourable witnesses - Whether trial judge erred in granting prosecution leave to cross-examine its own witness - Unreliable evidence.

Evidence – Prior inconsistent statements - Relevance of such statements - Whether evidence of the truth of representations - Whether judge erred in granting leave to prosecutor to cross-examine its own witness.

Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – ss 38(1), 38(3), 38(6), 55(1), 59(1), 60, 102, 103, 192(2).

Files
57.rtf (54.97 KB)
57.pdf (103.52 KB)