DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University

[2009] HCA 27
Judgment date
Case number
C1/2009
Before
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell JJ
Catchwords

Practice and procedure – Pleadings - Amendment - Where application for leave to amend statement of claim made on third day of four week trial - Whether application should have been granted.

Practice and procedure – Pleadings - Amendment - Where Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT) ("Rules"), r 502 provided that court may give leave to amend pleadings "in the way it considers appropriate" - Where r 21 provided objectives of Rules to facilitate just resolution of real issues in proceedings and timely disposal of proceedings at affordable cost - Relevance of case management principles to application to amend - Capacity of costs to overcome prejudice to opposing party - Whether party should be permitted to amend to raise arguable issue subject to payment of costs - Whether Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 [1997] HCA 1 should be overruled - Relevance of stage of proceedings at which amendment sought - Relevance of explanation for delay in seeking amendment - Relevance of extent of proposed amendment.

Practice and procedure – Pleadings - Amendment - Where r 501(a) of Rules provided that all necessary amendments must be made for purpose of deciding "real issues in the proceeding" - Whether court retains discretion to grant amendment in these circumstances - Whether amendment necessary to raise arguable issues.

Practice and procedure – Pleadings - Amendment - Where r 501(c) of Rules provided that all necessary amendments must be made for purpose of "avoiding multiple proceedings" - Whether amendment necessary where potential further proceedings - Relevance of possibility that further proceedings would be barred on abuse of process or estoppel grounds.

Evidence – Legal professional privilege - Whether inference may be drawn from absence of explanation for delay where explanation rested on legal advice.

Words and phrases – "all necessary amendments", "avoiding multiple proceedings", "just resolution", "real issues in the proceeding".

Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT) – rr 21, 501, 502.

Files
27.rtf (109.55 KB)
27.pdf (227.93 KB)