DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Chaffey
Santos Limited v Chaffey

[2007] HCA 34
Judgment date
Case number
D2/2007
D3/2007
Before
Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan, Heydon, Crennan JJ
Catchwords

Constitutional law (NT) – Acquisition of property - The respondent was a worker entitled to compensation under the Work Health Act (NT) ("the WHA") - The Work Health Amendment Act 2004 (NT) amended s 49 of the WHA so as to exclude employers' superannuation contributions from the definition of a worker's "remuneration" - Whether the amendment to s 49 was an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms.

Constitutional law (NT) – The legislative power of the Northern Territory does not extend to the making of laws with respect to the acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms - Statutory right to compensation - Whether amendment to the WHA amounted to an acquisition of property - Relevance of statutory right being "subject to" and "in accordance with" the statute as in force from time to time - Relevance of statutory obligation to provide "such compensation as is prescribed" - Inherent variability of statutory entitlements to workers' compensation.

Words and Phrases – "acquisition of property", "just terms", "remuneration".

Northern Territory (Self –Government) Act 1978 (Cth), ss 5, 6, 50.

Work Health Act (NT) – Pt 5, ss 49, 52, 53.

Work Health Amendment Act 2004 (NT).

Files
34.rtf (57.86 KB)
34.pdf (91.23 KB)