DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Attorney-General (SA) v Corporation of the City of Adelaide

[2013] HCA 3
Judgment date
Case number
A16/2012
Before
French CJ, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell JJ
Catchwords

Constitutional law – Implied freedom of communication on government and political matters – Where by-law prohibited preaching and distributing printed matter on any road without permission – Whether by-law effectively burdened freedom of political communication – Whether by-law reasonably appropriate and adapted to achieving legitimate end in manner compatible with system of representative and responsible government.

Local government – Where power to make by-laws "for the good rule and government of the area, and for the convenience, comfort and safety of its inhabitants" – Whether generally expressed by-law making power must be narrowly or restrictively construed – Whether by-law exceeded limitations on power delegated to local government under Local Government Act 1934 (SA) – Whether by-law complied with limitations and procedures prescribed by Local Government Act 1999 (SA) – Whether by-law was reasonable and proportionate exercise of by-law making power.

Words and phrases – "could not reasonably have been adopted", "legitimate end", "licence", "political communication", "principle of legality", "proportionality".

Constitution – ss 7, 24, 128.

Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (SA) – ss 9(1), 10(3).

Local Government Act 1934 (SA) – ss 667(1) 4 I, 667(1) 9 XVI.

Local Government Act 1999 (SA) – ss 4(1), 246(1)(a), 246(2), 248(1)(a), 249(4).

By –law No 4 – Roads, pars 2.3, 2.8.

Files
3.rtf (858.59 KB)
3.pdf (465.72 KB)