DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Brown
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Gillfillan
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Koffel
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Terry
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v O'Brien
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Willcox
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Shafron

[2012] HCA 17
Judgment date
Case number
S176/2011
S179/2011
S175/2011
180/2011
S181/2011
S174/2011
Before
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell JJ
Catchwords

Corporations – Duties and liabilities of directors and officers – Contraventions of civil penalty provisions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("the Act") – Corporation released misleading announcement to Australian Stock Exchange ("ASX") – Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC") brought proceedings against respondents (and others) for contraventions of the Act – Section 180(1) of the Act required directors and officers to act with degree of care and diligence that reasonable person in that position would exercise – ASIC alleged directors contravened s_180(1) by approving draft announcement not materially different from misleading announcement released to ASX – ASIC alleged company secretary and general counsel of corporation contravened s 180(1) by not advising board that draft announcement was misleading – Whether directors approved draft announcement.

Evidence – ASIC tendered minutes of board meeting recording tabling and approval of draft ASX announcement – Minutes subsequently approved – ASIC did not call corporation's solicitor, who had supervised preparation of draft minutes and attended board meeting – Whether ASIC owed respondents a "duty of fairness" in its conduct of litigation – Whether ASIC breached putative duty by not calling solicitor – Whether proper consequence of any such breach was to discount cogency of ASIC's case – Whether board minutes sufficient evidence to prove directors' approval of draft announcement.

Words and phrases – "cogency of proof", "duty of fairness", "obligation of fairness", "onus of proof", "satisfaction on the balance of probabilities".

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – ss 180(1), 251A, 1317L.

Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – s 140.

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – ss 64, 79, 80.

Files
17.rtf (155.21 KB)
17.pdf (386.65 KB)