DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Banditt v The Queen

[2005] HCA 80
Judgment date
Case number
S216/2005
Before
Gummow, Hayne, Callinan, Heydon JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Break and enter and commit serious indictable offence – Sexual assault – Recklessness as to consent – Appellant broke and entered complainant's house at night while complainant asleep – Complainant alleged appellant commenced intercourse while complainant asleep – Appellant claimed that complainant was awake and consented to intercourse and that appellant thought complainant was consenting – Complainant had rejected appellant's advances on a previous occasion – Whether trial judge erred in directing jury that appellant could have known complainant was not consenting because he was reckless as to consent – Whether recklessness requires more than advertence to possibility of lack of consent or requires determination to proceed with intercourse regardless of lack of consent – Whether appropriate to direct juries to apply an ordinary understanding of "recklessness".

Words and phrases – "reckless".

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 61I, 61R, 112(1).

Files
80.rtf (73.68 KB)
80.pdf (147.69 KB)