Kelly v The Queen

[2004] HCA 12
Judgment date
Case number
H1/2003
Before
Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon JJ
Catchwords

Criminal Law – Evidence - Admissibility of statement made to police after video-recorded interview was completed - Where statement was not made in response to any police question - Whether the statement was "made in the course of official questioning" within the meaning of s 8(1)(b) of the Criminal Law (Detention and Interrogation) Act 1995 (Tas).

Evidence – Admissibility - Statement made to police after video-recorded interview completed - Where statement was not made in response to any police question - Whether the statement was "made in the course of official questioning" within the meaning of s 8(1)(b) of the Criminal Law (Detention and Interrogation) Act 1995 (Tas).

Criminal Law – Appeal - Proviso - No substantial miscarriage of justice.

Statutes – Construction - Purposive construction - Use of definition sections to aid statutory construction.

Words and Phrases "made in the course of official questioning" – "confession or admission".

Criminal Law (Detention and Interrogation) Act 1995 (Tas) – ss 8(1), 8(2)(a).

Criminal Code (Tas) – s 402(2).

Files
12.rtf (103.45 KB)
12.pdf (234.12 KB)