Constitutional law (Cth) – Standing – Plaintiff sought declaration that Vicious Lawless Association Disestablishment Act 2013 (Q) and provisions of the Criminal Code (Q), Bail Act 1980 (Q) and Liquor Act 1992 (Q) were invalid – Where certain provisions only operated where offence committed against existing unchallenged laws – Whether plaintiff had sufficient interest to bring action.
Constitutional law (Cth) – Constitution, Ch III – Institutional integrity of State courts – Where ss 60A, 60B(1), 60B(2) and 60C of Criminal Code created offences elements of which involved being a "participant" in a "criminal organisation" – Where ss 173EB, 173EC and 173ED of Liquor Act created offences elements of which involved wearing symbols of membership of a "declared criminal organisation" – Where power, by regulation, to declare organisation a "criminal organisation" – Whether impugned provisions offended principle in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 – Whether Court enlisted to implement legislative or executive policy – Whether task given to Court incompatible with institutional integrity.
Words and phrases – "association", "criminal organisation", "institutional integrity", "Kable principle", "participant", "standing", "sufficient interest".
Bail Act 1980 (Q) – ss 16(3A), 16(3B), 16(3C), 16(3D).
Criminal Code (Q) – ss 60A, 60B(1), 60B(2), 60C, 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 92A(4A), 92A(4B), 92A(5), 320(2), 320(3), 320(4), 340(1A), 340(1B), 340(3).
Liquor Act 1992 (Q) – ss 173EB, 173EC, 173ED.
Vicious Lawless Association Disestablishment Act 2013 (Q).
Judgment date
Case number
B14/2014
Before
French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler, Keane JJ
Catchwords