Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

The Queen v Carroll

[2002] HCA 55
Judgment date
Case number
B82/2001
Before
Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Perjury - Accused at murder trial denies in evidence that he killed the deceased - Accused acquitted of murder and subsequently indicted for perjury in relation to sworn statement - Whether perjury charge undermined accused's acquittal of earlier charge of murder - Whether perjury charge infringed common law rule against "double jeopardy".

Criminal law – Double jeopardy - Res judicata - Issue estoppel - Autrefois acquit - Preclusion.

Practice and procedure – Power of court to stay indictments for abuse of process - Whether perjury indictment should have been stayed as an abuse of process.

Criminal Code (Q) – ss 17, 123, 584, 592A, 598, 602, 631.

Evidence Act 1977 (Q) – s 8.

Words and phrases – "Double jeopardy".

Files
55.rtf (86.12 KB)
55.pdf (207.26 KB)