Criminal law – Evidence - Admissibility and relevance - Propensity evidence - Evidence of uncharged acts - Appellant former psychiatrist charged with offences relating to sexual misconduct with two former patients - Evidence of sexual misconduct with three former patients adduced at trial - Whether trial judge erred in ruling evidence of uncharged acts had significant probative value.
Criminal law – Evidence - Admissions - Appellant conceded having consensual sexual activity with both complainants - Whether concession constituted admission for the purposes of s 32 of Evidence Act 1906 (WA) - Whether concession rendered consent the only live issue at trial.
Words and phrases – "significant probative value".
Evidence Act 1906 (WA) – ss 31A, 32.
Judgment date
Case number
P29/2010
Before
Gummow, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell JJ
Catchwords