DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

TKWJ v The Queen

[2002] HCA 46
Judgment date
Case number
S176/2001
Before
Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Conviction - Aggravated indecent assault - Aggravated indecency - Matters connected with conduct of defence - Failure of defence counsel to call character evidence - No application for voir dire - Whether tactical decision of defence counsel not to call character evidence constituted a miscarriage of justice where that evidence may have been excluded - Chance of acquittal "fairly open" not lost.

Criminal law – Appeal - Practice and procedure - "On any other ground whatsoever" - Allegation defendant not competently or adequately represented - Tactical decision at trial - Whether forensic advantage - Informed and deliberate decision - No miscarriage of justice.

Criminal law – Appeal - Circumstances in which conduct of legal practitioners can provide grounds for appeal - Relevant principles.

Criminal law – Jurisdiction - Trial judge - "Advance ruling" - Whether required by Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - Whether within implied powers of District Court - Power to conduct voir dire to make "advance ruling".

Words and Phrases – "fairly open", "on any other ground whatsoever", "advance ruling".

Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 6(1).

Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – ss 55, 110, 135, 136, 137, 189, 192.

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 61M(1), 61O(1).

District Court Rules 1973 (NSW) – Pt 53 rr 10, 11(1).

Files
46.rtf (77.7 KB)
46.pdf (148.96 KB)