DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Vale v Sutherland

[2009] HCA 26
Judgment date
Case number
S38/2009
Before
Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel JJ
Catchwords

Bankruptcy – Notice - Official Receiver issued notice under s 139ZQ of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Act") asserting certain property transactions void under s 120 of the Act - Notice asserted market value of properties at time of transfer - Failure to comply with notice may result in criminal sanctions under s 139ZT of the Act - Whether notice should be set aside under s 30 or s 139ZS if value stated incorrect.

Bankruptcy – Notice - Whether value in s 139ZQ of the Act value at time of transfer or when notice given.

Practice and procedure – Pleadings - Whether correctness of value traversed in defence or cross-claim - Effect of failure to make specific denial or specific non- admission in pleadings where trial conducted on basis that correctness of value was in issue.

Words and phrases – "valuation", "value ".

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – ss 5, 30, 40(1)(g), 115, 120, 127, 139K, 139ZQ, 139ZR, 139ZS, 139ZT.

Federal Court Rules (Cth) – O 11, r 13(2).

Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) – rr 1.03, 1.05.

Federal Magistrates Court Act 1999 (Cth) – s 76.

Files
26.rtf (44.41 KB)
26.pdf (74.33 KB)