Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Douglass v. The Queen

Case No. A17/2012
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

4/02/2011 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Gray J, Sulan J, Anderson J)

[2011] SASCFC 6

Catchwords

Criminal law — Evidence — Burden of proof — Sexual offences — Unsworn evidence — Applicant tried before a judge alone of two counts of indecent assault against his daughter ("LD") and one count of aggravated indecent assault against LD's daughter ("CD") — Applicant found not guilty of counts concerning LD and guilty of count concerning CD — LD's evidence given in form of a video under s 34CA of the Evidence Act 1929 (SA) — LD's evidence unsworn and uncorroborated — LD's evidence contradicted in court by accused’s sworn evidence — Only evidence adduced by prosecution in relation to the offence against LD was that of LD — Whether or not the burden of proof against the applicant discharged — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in considering that this case was a case of "word against word".

Short Particulars

Documents

11/05/2012 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by V/link to Adelaide)

25/05/2012 Notice of appeal

12/06/2012 Written submissions (Appellant)

13/06/2012 Chronology (Appellant)

03/07/2012 Written submissions (Respondent)

17/07/2012 Reply

16/08/2012 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)

07/09/2012 Judgment (Judgment summary)