Stakaj v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case No.
A19/2016
Related matters.
A14/2016 NH v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;
A15/2016 Jakaj v. The Direction of Public Prosecutions
A16/2016 Zefi v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Sulan J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – procedure – jury – verdict – alternative verdict – exercise of jurisdiction – whether the Supreme Court of a State has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside perfected orders that there be a conviction or acquittal – whether open to the court to admit evidence of the 12 (former) jurors in relation to whether the jury had determined to return a verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder.
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
13/04/2016 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)
20/04/2016 Notice of appeal
20/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
20/04/2016 Chronology
27/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)
06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
18/05/2016 Reply
09/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
31/08/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)
31/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)