Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Comcare v. Banerji

Case No. C12/2018
Case information

Catchwords

Constitutional law – Implied freedom of political communication – Where employee of Department of Immigration and Citizenship used Twitter account to post anonymous “tweets” critical of Department – Where Department terminated employment under s 15 of Public Service Act 1999 (Cth) on basis employee used social media in breach of ss 13(1), 13(7) and 13(11) of Australian Public Service Code of Conduct – Where employee submitted claim for compensation under s 14 of Safety, Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1988 (Cth) on basis termination led to psychological condition – Where Comcare rejected claim – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal set aside decision on basis termination infringed implied freedom of political communication so termination not “reasonable administrative action taken in a reasonable manner” within meaning of s 5A of Safety, Compensation and Rehabilitation Act – Whether ss 13(11) and 15 of Public Service Act incompatible with implied freedom of political communication – Whether Tribunal erred in failing to find decision to terminate employment constituted “reasonable administrative action taken in a reasonable manner”. 

Short particulars

Documents

12/09/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)

25/09/2018 Cause removed

07/11/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)

07/11/2018 Chronology (Appellant)

07/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

14/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)

14/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)

14/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)

05/12/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)

12/12/2018 Written submissions (Australian Human Rights Commission seeking leave to appear as amicus curiae)

19/12/2018 Reply (Appellant)

19/12/2018 Reply (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

20/03/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

20/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

20/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

20/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for New South Wales intervening)

20/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for South Australia intervening)

20/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for Western Australia intervening)

21/03/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

21/03/2019 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)

07/08/2019 Judgment (Judgment summary)