High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4:00pm AEDT on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026. If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition, provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

The Queen v. Falzon

Case No. M161/2017
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

5/04/2017 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Whelan, Priest and  Beach JJA)

[2017] VSCA 74

Catchwords

Criminal law – Evidence – Admissibility – Drug trafficking – Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) ss 71AC, 72A – Where respondent convicted of cultivating commercial quantity of cannabis contrary to s 72A and trafficking drug of dependence contrary to s 71AC(1) – Where trial judge admitted evidence of cash secreted in various locations at respondent’s home as “indicia of trafficking” – Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) ss 55(1), 137 – Where majority of Court of Appeal held substantial miscarriage of justice because trial judge erred in admitting evidence of cash found at respondent’s home – Whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding substantial miscarriage of justice.

Short particulars

Documents

20/10/2017 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)

03/11/2017 Notice of appeal

24/11/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

24/11/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

09/03/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)

26/03/2018 Reply

19/04/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

19/04/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

19/04/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)

08/08/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)