Lordianto & Anor v. Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
Case No.
S110/2019
Related matter
P17/2019 – Kalimuthu & Anor v. Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
11/09/2018 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal) (Beazley P, Payne JA, McColl JA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Proceeds of crime – Where large number of deposits were made into bank accounts in amounts of less than $10,000 – Whether each Court of Appeal misconstrued “third party” in s 330(4)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) to exclude person who acquires property at time it becomes proceeds or an instrument of an offence – Whether each Court of Appeal wrongly interpreted term “sufficient consideration” in ss 330(4)(a) and 338 as requiring connection between third party acquirer of property and person from whom property passed – Whether each Court of Appeal erred in interpreting and applying “circumstances that would not arouse a reasonable suspicion, that the property was proceeds of an offence or an instrument of an offence” in s 330(4)(a).
Documents*
22/03/2019 Hearing (SLA, Sydney v/link Perth)
02/04/2019 Notice of appeal
08/05/2019 Written submissions (Appellants)
08/05/2019 Chronology (Appellants)
05/06/2019 Written submissions (Respondent)
24/06/2019 Reply
07/08/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
07/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Appellants)
08/08/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
08/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
13/11/2019 Judgment (Judgment summary)