High Court Registry closure

The High Court Registry will be closed from 4:00pm AEDT on Wednesday, 24 December 2025 and will re-open at 9:00am on Friday, 2 January 2026.

Any party seeking to file a document due to be filed between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 has an automatic extension of time under the High Court Rules 2004 (Rule 4.01.5) until 4:00pm on Friday, 2 January 2026 to file the document. Any documents lodged between 25 December 2025 and 1 January 2026 will be reviewed on 2 January 2026.

All inquiries for the High Court will be considered when the Registry re-opens on Friday, 2 January 2026. If a matter is of extreme urgency, you may telephone 1800 570 566, select Option 1 and leave a voicemail. In addition, provide details by email to: registry@hcourt.gov.au.

Arsalan v. Rixon
Nguyen v. Cassim

Case No. S35/2021 and S36/2021
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

18/06/2020 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal) (Meagher & White JJA, Emmett AJA)

[2020] NSWCA 115

Catchwords

Torts – Damages – Damage to chattel – Where applicants’ negligence resulted in motor vehicle collision with respondents’ “high-value”, “prestige” vehicles – Where respondents’ vehicles damaged, and respondents hired replacement vehicles of equivalent value while damaged vehicles underwent repairs – Where respondents claimed damages for cost of hiring replacement vehicles of equivalent value in NSW Local Court – Where magistrate awarded damages only for cost of hiring suitable replacement vehicle for uses vehicle will likely to be put, not necessarily of equivalent value – Where respondents’ appeal to Supreme Court dismissed – Where respondents’ appeal to Court of Appeal allowed – Where Court of Appeal majority held damages be awarded to put claimant in position they would have been in before wrongdoing, i.e., for replacement vehicle of equivalent value – Where each judge in Court of Appeal applied different standard – Whether respondents entitled to claim damages for cost of hiring replacement vehicles of equivalent value to damaged prestige vehicles – Whether equivalent value replacement vehicle reasonable – Correct test of quantification of damages.

Documents

12/03/2021 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)

26/03/2021 Notices of appeal

30/04/2021 Written submissions (Appellant in S35/2021)

30/04/2021 Chronology (Appellant in S35/2021)

30/04/2021 Written submissions (Appellant in S36/2021)

30/04/2021 Chronology (Appellant in S36/2021)

28/05/2021 Written submissions (Respondent in S35/2021)

28/05/2021 Written submissions (Respondent in S36/2021)

18/06/2021 Reply (Appellant in S35/2021)

18/06/2021 Reply (Appellant in S36/2021)

8/09/2021 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra and by video connection)

8/09/2021 Outline of oral argument (Appellant in S35/2021)

8/09/2021 Outline of oral argument (Respondent in S35/2021)

8/09/2021 Outline of oral argument (Appellant in S36/2021)

8/09/2021 Outline of oral argument (Respondent in S36/2021)

08/12/2021 Judgment (Judgment summary)