Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Reeves v The Queen

[2013] HCA 57
Judgment date
Case number
S44/2013
Before
French CJ, Crennan, Bell, Gageler, Keane JJ
Catchwords

Criminal law – Malicious infliction of grievous bodily harm with intent – Consent to battery resulting from surgery – Whether "informed consent" was correct test – Whether patient informed in broad terms of nature of procedure – Application of Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479.

Criminal law – Appeal – Appeal against conviction – Application of proviso – Whether misdirection to jury actually resulted in substantial miscarriage of justice.


Criminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where appellate court failed to consider residual discretion.

Words and phrases – "consent to medical procedure", "proviso", "substantial miscarriage of justice", "residual discretion".

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 33.

Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ss 5D, 6(1).

Files
57.rtf (202.86 KB)
57.pdf (77.91 KB)