DLS Portal Maintenance Outage September 2025

The DLS Portal will be offline for maintenance and upgrades from 6.00pm (AEST) Friday, 12 September 2025 to 8.00am (AEST) Monday, 15 September 2025.

Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission

[2013] HCA 39
Judgment date
Case number
S29/2013
Before
French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler, Keane JJ
Catchwords

Statutes – Interpretation – Recovery of proceeds of crime – Examination orders – Appellants charged with offences – New South Wales Crime Commission applied for orders that appellants be examined on oath pursuant to s 31D of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) – Subject matter of examination would have overlapped with subject matter of criminal proceedings – Whether s 31D empowered examination of person charged with offences where subject matter of examination would overlap with subject matter of offences charged.

Words and phrases – "accusatorial system of criminal justice", "derivative use immunity", "direct use immunity", "examination", "fair trial", "principle of legality", "privilege against self-incrimination", "real risk of interference with the administration of justice", "right to silence", "serious crime related activity".

Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) – ss 12, 13, 13A, 31D, 63.

Files
39.rtf (1.27 MB)
39.pdf (569.17 KB)