Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSCA

[2014] HCA 45
Judgment date
Case number
S109/2014
Before
French CJ, Hayne, Kiefel, Gageler, Keane JJ
Catchwords

Migration – Refugees – Application for protection visa – Where applicantthreatened by Taliban – Where Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed decision notto grant protection visa because risk of persecution would only arise on roadsoutside Kabul, which applicant could avoid – Whether Refugee Review Tribunalfell into error identified in Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration andMulticultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473; [2003] HCA 71 – Whether RefugeeReview Tribunal failed to address whether it would be reasonable to expectapplicant to remain in Kabul.

Words and phrases – "internal relocation principle", "live discreetly", "realchance of persecution", "reasonable to expect", "well-founded fear ofpersecution".

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – s 36(2)(a).

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) as amended by the Protocolrelating to the Status of Refugees (1967), Art 1A(2).

Files
45.rtf (199.26 KB)
45.pdf (154.68 KB)