Migration – Refugees – Appeal as of right from Supreme Court of Nauru – Where Secretary of Department of Justice and Border Control of Nauru ("Secretary") determined appellant not refugee under Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where Secretary determined Nauru did not owe appellant complementary protection under Refugees Convention Act – Where Refugee Status Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") affirmed Secretary's determinations on basis appellant could reasonably relocate within country of origin – Where Supreme Court of Nauru affirmed Tribunal's decision – Whether appellant's ability reasonably to relocate within country of origin relevant to claim for complementary protection – Whether Tribunal failed to take into account factors relevant to appellant's ability reasonably to relocate – Whether Tribunal required under Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) to give primary consideration to best interests of appellant's child.
Words and phrases – "best interests of children", "best interests of the child", "complementary protection", "internal relocation", "reasonable internal relocation", "reasonable relocation", "refugee", "well-founded fear of persecution".
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) – Arts 2, 3(1).
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).
Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – s 5.
Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – ss 4, 43.
