Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

CRI028 v The Republic of Nauru

[2018] HCA 24
Judgment date
Case number
M66/2017
Before
Bell, Gordon, Edelman JJ
Catchwords

Migration – Refugees – Appeal as of right from Supreme Court of Nauru –Where Secretary of Department of Justice and Border Control determined appellant not refugee – Where Refugee Status Review Tribunal affirmed Secretary's determination – Where appellant established well-founded fear of persecution – Where Tribunal found alternative "home area" – Whether Tribunal properly applied internal relocation principle – Whether Tribunal failed to consider family unity – Whether Supreme Court erred in affirming Tribunal's determination.

Words and phrases – "family unity", "home area", "in all the circumstances", "internal relocation principle", "reasonableness of relocation", "relocation".

Appeals Act 1972 (Nr) – s 44.

Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – s 5, Sched, Art 1.

Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – ss 3, 4, 5, 6, 22, 31, 34, 43, 44.

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) as modified by the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (1967) – Art 1A(2).

Files
24.rtf (190.42 KB)
24.pdf (152.36 KB)