Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Issak v. The King & Ors

Bekele v. The King & Ors

Haile v. The King & Ors

Case No. A21/2026, A22/2026, A23/2026
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

13/02/2026 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Bleby J, David J.

[2026] SASCA 9

Catchwords

Issak v. The King & Ors (A21/2026)

Criminal law – sexual offences – joint criminal enterprise – where primary Judge found no case to answer for joint criminal enterprise at trial – where primary Judge directed acquittals for each of the appellant’s charges – where prosecution appealed acquittals – where appellate court quashed acquittals and ordered a new trial – whether subsequent recognition of necessary confinement of prosecution case on retrial increases force of double jeopardy considerations

Bekele v. The King & Ors (A22/2026)

Criminal law – sexual offences – joint criminal enterprise – appellant found guilty on certain counts following trial by jury – where primary Judge directed acquittals for certain counts – where prosecution appealed acquittals – where appellate court quashed acquittals and ordered a new trial – whether subsequent recognition of necessary confinement of prosecution case on retrial increases force of double jeopardy considerations

Haile v. The King & Ors (A23/2026)

Criminal law – sexual offences – joint criminal enterprise – appellant found guilty on certain counts following trial by jury – where primary Judge directed acquittals for certain counts – where prosecution appealed acquittals – where appellate court quashed acquittals and ordered a new trial – whether subsequent recognition of necessary confinement of prosecution case on retrial increases force of double jeopardy considerations

Documents