Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Bradshaw v. The King

Case No. B48/2026
Case information

Lower Court Judgment

20/03/2025 Supreme Court of Queensland, (Court of Appeal) (Bond JA, Gotterson AJA and Bradley J)

[2025] QCA 172

Catchwords

Criminal law – conviction – murder – miscarriage of justice – impaired capacity – where deceased died in a house fire – where appellant confessed in police interview to setting fire to the house as an act of vengeance – where  appellant disclosed in the police interview mental health treatment and taking medication below the prescribed dose – where police did not suspend questioning and allow appellant to have a support person present under s 422 of the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 (Qld) – where pre-trial application to exclude record of police interview refused – where video of police interview played to jury – where trial judge gave no direction to jury of the kind given in Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 – statutory construction – s 422 of the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 (Qld) – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that ‘external evidence or indicia’ was necessary for a police officer to reasonably suspect that appellant had impaired capacity – whether trial judge’s refusal to exclude police record of interview resulted in miscarriage of justice – whether trial judge’s failure to give a Bromley direction resulted in miscarriage of justice

 

Documents
11/06/2026 Determination [2026] HCADisp 145
25/06/2026 Notice of appeal
30/07/2026
30/07/2026
27/08/2026
17/09/2026
Reply (Appellant) (435.65 KB)