Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Awad v The Queen
Tambakakis v The Queen

[2022] HCA 36
Judgment date
Case number
M44/2022
M45/2022
Before
Kiefel CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson JJ
Catchwords

Criminal Practice – Appeal – Error or irregularity in trial – Directions to jury – Where credibility of one accused giving evidence central to both trials – Where trial judge directed jury that innocent person can do nothing more than give evidence – Where trial judge directed jury that guilty person may give evidence in hope or belief they will more likely be believed – Where directions prohibited by s 44J of Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic) – Whether misdirection constituted substantial miscarriage of justice.
Words and phrases – "charge", "conviction was inevitable", "credibility", "deflect the jury from its fundamental task", "direction", "essential to a fair trial", "fundamental error", "jury", "misdirection", "motivation to give evidence", "natural limitations", "onus of proof", "presumption of innocence", "prohibited direction", "serious departure from the prescribed processes for trial", "substantial miscarriage of justice".
Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 276(1)(b).
Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic), ss 44J, 44K.
 

Files
36.docx (116.31 KB)
36.pdf (323.89 KB)