Scam alert – fraudulent email address ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’

The Court is aware of a scam involving the use of a fraudulent email address purporting to be an official High Court email address – ‘subpoena@hcourt.gov.au’ 

This email address is not associated with, authorised by, or operated by the Court. 

Recipients of emails from this account should exercise caution and should not click on links, open attachments or provide personal or financial information. 

Kramer v Stone

[2024] HCA 48
Judgment date
Case number
S53/2024
Before
Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson, Beech-Jones JJ
Catchwords

Estoppel – Equitable estoppel – Proprietary estoppel – Proprietary estoppel by encouragement – Where promisor made promise to bequeath property to promisee – Where promisor did not further encourage promisee to rely on promise after making promise – Where promisee acted to his detriment in reliance on promise – Where promisor did not bequeath property to promisee – Whether promisee required to prove promisor undertook subsequent acts of encouragement after initial promise – Whether promisee required to prove promisor had actual knowledge that promisee would act or had acted in reliance on promise to promisee's detriment.

Words and phrases – "actual knowledge", "clear and unequivocal promise", "constructive knowledge", "detriment", "detrimental reliance", "encouragement", "encouragement from a promise", "equitable estoppel", "estoppel", "estoppel by acquiescence", "estoppel by encouragement", "estoppel by encouragement from a promise", "imperfect gift", "proprietary estoppel", "proprietary estoppel by encouragement", "reliance", "subsequent encouragement", "unconscionable".

Files
48.docx (132.36 KB)
48.pdf (309.71 KB)