Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: ALEXANDER v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
Date: 16 Feburary 2022 , 17 Feburary 2022
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 31m, 4h 28m,
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
16 Feburary 2022
17 Feburary 2022
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case:Farm Transparency International Ltd & Anor v State of New South Wales
Date: 10 Feburary 2022 , 11 Feburary 2022
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 5m, 2h 39m,
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
10 Feburary 2022
11 Feburary 2022
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Citta Hobart PTY LTD & Anor v Cawthorn
Date: 08 Feburary 2022 , 09 Feburary 2022
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 34m, 3h 49m,
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
08 Feburary 2022
09 Feburary 2022
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Dansie v. The Queen
Case No.
A4/2022
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
02/11/2020 Supreme Court of South Australia (Nicholson, Parker and Livesey JJ)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Murder – Unreasonable verdict – Verdict unsupported by evidence – Where appellant's wife drowned after her wheelchair entered pond – Where prosecution alleged intentional drowning – Where, on defence case, drowning accidental – Where s 158(1)(a) of Criminal Procedure Act 1921 (SA) provided for appeal to be allowed where Court considers verdict should be set aside on ground that conviction unreasonable or cannot be supporting having regard to evidence – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal failed to conduct independent assessment of whole of evidence – Whether open to trial judge to exclude hypothesis of accidental drowning – Proper approach by intermediate appellate court to "unreasonable verdict" limb of common form appeal provision following judge-alone trial.
Documents*
18/02/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)
04/03/2022 Notice of appeal
08/04/2022 Written submissions (Appellant)
08/04/2022 Chronology (Appellant)
06/05/2022 Written submissions (Respondent)
24/05/2022 Reply
15/06/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
15/06/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
14/06/2022 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
10/08/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Google LLC v. Defteros
Case No.
M86/2021
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
17/06/2021 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Beach, Kaye and Niall JJA)
Catchwords
Defamation – Publication – Qualified privilege defence – Common law qualified privilege – Statutory qualified privilege – Where respondent alleged that certain webpages were published by appellant and were defamatory – Where two webpages consisted of set of search results displayed on website www.google.com.au in response to search of respondent's name and hyperlinked article, included in search results, entitled "Underworld loses valued friend at court" (Web Matter) – Where appellant alleged it was for "common convenience and welfare of society" for appellant to return search results that hyperlinked articles published by reputable sources – Where appellant claimed material was matter of considerable public interest such that recipients had necessary interest in material for purposes of s 30(1) of Defamation Act 2005 (Vic) – Whether appellant published Web Matter – Whether common law qualified privilege defence applies – Whether the statutory qualified privilege defence in s 30(1) applies.
Documents
10/12/2021 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by video-connection)
24/12/2021 Notice of appeal
21/01/2022 Written submissions (Appellant)
21/01/2022 Chronology (Appellant)
18/02/2022 Written submissions (Respondent)
11/03/2022 Reply
03/05/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
03/05/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
03/05/2022 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
17/08/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)