Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: H. Lundbeck A/S & Anor; CNS Pharma Pty Ltd v Sandoz Pty Ltd
Date: 08 October 2021
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 26m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Walton & Anor v ACN 004 410 833 Limited (Formerly Arrium Limited) (In liquidation) & Ors
Date: 06 October 2021, 07 October 2021
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 1h 59m, 3h 21m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
06 Oct 21
07 Oct 21
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Bell v State of Tasmania
Date: 05 October 2021, 06 October 2021
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 01m, 1h 55m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
05 October 2021
06 October 2021
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
O'Dea v. The State of Western Australia
Case No.
P53/2021
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
13/04/2021 Supreme Court of Western Australia (Court of Appeal) (Buss P, Mazza and Vaughan JJA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Joint liability – Acting in concert – Where appellant and co-accused stood trial on one count of doing grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm contrary to s 294(1) of the Criminal Code (WA) – Where appellant and co-accused alleged jointly criminally responsible – Where trial judge gave jury handout, relevantly describing circumstances in which two accused may be criminally responsible as "joint principals" under s 7(a) of Code – Where appellant was convicted but co-accused discharged with jury unable to reach verdict – Where Court of Appeal held criminal responsibility under s 7(a) of Code extended to cases where several persons are "acting in concert" – Whether appellant and co-accused can be criminally liable as joint principals in circumstances where the acts of co-accused were not proved unlawful – Whether trial judge was required to direct jury that "acting in concert" requires two accused to have reached an understanding or arrangement amounting to agreement to commit crime.
Documents*
03/12/2021 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by video-connection)
15/12/2021 Notice of appeal
21/01/2022 Written submissions (Appellant)
21/01/2022 Chronology (Appellant)
18/02/2022 Written submissions (Respondent)
11/03/2022 Reply
04/05/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
04/05/2022 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
04/05/2022 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
10/08/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Ruddick v. Commonwealth of Australia
Case No.
S151/2021
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitutional law – Implied freedom of political communication – Where ss 7 and 24 of Constitution contain words "directly chosen by the people" – Where plaintiff was registered member of registered political party – Where sections were inserted into or amended Part XI the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) by ss 7, 9, 11 and 14 of Electoral Legislation Amendment (Party Registration Integrity) Act 2021 (Cth) ("provisions") – Where Part XI of Commonwealth Electoral Act provided for registration of political parties – Where provisions required new political party to accompany application for registration with written consent of first-registered political party where names or logos of new and first-registered parties had word in common – Where provisions enabled first-registered party to object to continued use by subsequent party of name or logo – Whether provisions are contrary to ss 7 and 24 of Constitution – Whether provisions are contrary to implied freedom of political communication.
Documents*
24/09/2021 Writ of summons
27/10/2021 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra by video-connection)
27/10/2021 Amended writ of summons
29/11/2021 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra by video-connection)
01/12/2021 Consent referring special case to Full Court
03/12/2021 Special case
04/01/2022 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
04/01/2022 Chronology (Plaintiff)
24/01/2022 Written submissions (Defendant)
28/01/2022 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia, intervening)
31/01/2022 Written submissions (Attorney-General for New South Wales, intervening)
04/02/2022 Reply
15/02/2022 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
14/02/2022 Outline of oral argument (Plaintiffs)
15/02/2022 Outline of oral argument (Defendant)
14/02/2022 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for New South Wales, intervening)
15/02/2022 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)
09/03/2022 Pronouncement of orders (Full Court, Canberra)
25/03/2022 Judgment (Judgment summary)