WET 052 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
S267/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
6/11/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan J)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
20/11/2017 Notice of appeal
05/02/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
05/02/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
26/02/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
12/03/2018 Reply (Appellant)
15/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
15/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
15/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
17/10/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
ETA067 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
M167/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
13/11/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan ACJ)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
27/11/2017 Notice of appeal
29/01/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
29/01/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
19/02/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
06/03/2018 Reply (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
17/10/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
HFM043 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
M146/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
22/09/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan J)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
06/10/2017 Notice of appeal
17/11/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
17/11/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
20/12/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)
09/02/2018 Reply
14/03/2018 Summons seeking leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
15/08/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Comptroller General of Customs v. Zappia
Case No.
S91/2018
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
19/09/2017 Federal Court of Australia (Davies J, White J, Moshinsky J)
Catchwords
Interpretation – Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 35A – Where respondent employed as general manager of company operating warehouse – Where cigarettes stolen from warehouse – Where respondent served with notice under s 35A of Act requiring payment of amount of duty payable on stolen cigarettes – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal dismissed application for review of decision to issue notice – Where Full Federal Court allowed appeal – Whether majority of Full Court erred in holding employee of entity holding license to warehouse dutiable goods not capable of being “person who has, or has been entrusted with, the possession, custody or control of dutiable goods” within meaning of s 35A(1) – Whether majority of Full Court erred in holding that on proper construction of s 35A(1), statutory demand issued by appellant to respondent invalid and of no effect.
Documents
21/03/2018 Determination (SLA, Canberra)
04/04/2018 Notice of appeal
09/05/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
10/05/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
06/06/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
27/06/2018 Reply
08/08/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
08/08/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
08/08/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
14/11/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Williams v. Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community Council & Anor
Case No.
C5/2018
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
23/10/2017 Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory (Court of Appeal) (Murrell CJ, Burns J, Mossop J)
Catchwords
Interpretation – Concurrent operation – Where Council leased property to appellant under residential tenancy agreement – Where appellant commenced proceedings in ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal seeking orders for repairs and compensation – Where Tribunal referred questions of law to Supreme Court for determination – Where Court of Appeal allowed appeal – Whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding ACT laws retain subordinate status when applied to Jervis Bay Territory by force of s 4A of Jervis Bay Territory Acceptance Act 1915 (Cth) – Whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding ss 8 and 9 of Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (ACT) not capable of operating concurrently with Aboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act 1986 (Cth) such that ss 8 and 9 do not apply to “Aboriginal Land” for purposes of s 46 of Aboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act.
Documents
21/03/2018 Determination (SLA, Canberra)
04/04/2018 Notice of appeal
09/05/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
09/05/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
06/06/2018 Written submissions (Second Respondent)
20/06/2018 Written submissions (First Respondent)
13/07/2018 Reply
12/09/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
12/09/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
12/09/2018 Outline of oral argument (First respondent)
12/09/2018 Outline of oral argument (Second respondent)
13/02/2019 Judgment (Judgment summary)