Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Cases:

Date: 30 March 2017

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 4h 32m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: Commissioner of Taxation v. Jayasinghe

Date: 29 March 2017

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 3h 56m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Case: Knight v. State of Victoria & Anor

Date: 28 March 2017

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 3h 57m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Thorne v. Kennedy

Case No.

B14/2017

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

26/09/2016 Family Court of Australia(Strickland J, Aldridge J, Cronin J)

Catchwords

Family law – Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 90K, 90KA – Where parties signed financial agreements prior to and shortly after wedding – Where parties subsequently separated – Where trial judge found wife signed agreements under duress – Where Full Court declared second financial agreement binding – Whether financial agreements should be set aside on grounds of duress, undue influence or unconscionable conduct – Whether Full Court erred in finding trial judge failed to provide adequate reasons.

Short particulars

Documents

10/03/2017 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)

22/03/2017 Notice of appeal

21/04/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

21/04/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

11/05/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)

24/05/2017 Reply

08/08/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Brisbane)

08/11/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Aldi Foods Pty Limited v. Shop, Distributive & Allied Employees Association & Anor

Case No.

M33/2017

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

29/11/2016 Federal Court of Australia (Jessup J, Katzmann J, White J)

[2016] FCAFC 161

Catchwords

Industrial law – Jurisdictional error – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – Approval of enterprise agreements – Whether Fair Work Commission fell into jurisdictional error in exercising functions under s 186 – Whether within Fair Work Commission’s jurisdiction to determine whether group of employees who voted on single enterprise agreement within coverage of agreement – Whether Fair Work Commission fell into jurisdictional error in determining agreement satisfied “better off overall test” under s 193 – Unreasonableness in jurisdictional sense.

Short particulars

Documents

08/03/2017 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)

20/03/2017 Notice of appeal

23/03/2017 Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)

29/03/2017 Notice of Contention (First Respondent)

11/04/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

11/04/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

10/05/2017 Written submissions (First Respondent)

24/05/2017 Reply

09/08/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Brisbane)

06/12/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Page 140 of 259