Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Minogue v. State of Victoria
Date: 18 June 2019
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 23m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: BVD17 v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor
Date: 13 June 2019
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 49m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
Date: 12 June 2019
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 15m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Vella & Ors v. Commissioner of Police (NSW) & Anor
Case No.
S30/2019
Case Information
Catchwords
Application by the first defendant to the Supreme Court of New South Wales under the Crimes (Serious Crime Prevention Orders) Act 2016 (NSW) seeking orders restraining the plaintiffs from various behaviour – application asserts serious crime-related activity and refers to criminal charges of which the first and second plaintiffs were acquitted – whether s 5(1) of the Act is invalid, in light of Chapter III of the Constitution, by virtue of incompatibility with the institutional integrity of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the District Court of New South Wales.
Documents*
07/02/2019 Writ of summons
11/02/2019 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)
31/05/2019 Special Case Stated (Plaintiffs)
03/06/2019 Hearing (Single Justice, Brisbane v/link to Sydney)
24/06/2019 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)
24/06/2019 Chronology (Plaintiffs)
15/07/2019 Written submissions (Defendants)
22/07/2019 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
22/07/2019 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
22/07/2019 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
22/07/2019 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)
22/07/2019 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
29/07/2019 Reply (Plaintiffs)
06/08/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Plaintiffs)
06/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Defendants)
06/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
06/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
06/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
07/08/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
07/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
07/08/2019 Revised outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
07/08/2019 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)
06/11/2019 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Grech v. The Queen
Case No.
S163/2019
Related matter:
S160/2019 – Kadir v. The Queen
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
30/11/2017 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Ward JA, Price & Beech-Jones JJ)
Catchwords
Evidence – Discretionary exclusion – Where evidence obtained improperly or illegally – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – Whether the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal (“CCA”) erred in finding appealable error in the trial judge’s decision on basis that trial judge did not assess each item of evidence individually – Whether the CCA erred in finding error in trial judge’s finding that s 138 factors governing exclusion of recordings “directly applicable” to other evidence obtained as consequence of illegally obtained recordings – Whether CCA erred in its application of s 138 by failing to apply correctly the onus of proof and taking into account considerations contrary to evidence and failing to take into account material consideration.
Documents
17/05/2019 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
31/05/2019 Notice of appeal
05/07/2019 Written submissions (Appellant)
05/07/2019 Chronology (Appellant)
01/08/2019 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)
02/08/2019 Written submissions (Respondent)
23/08/2019 Reply
15/10/2019 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
15/10/2019 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
15/10/2019 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
05/02/2020 Judgment (Judgment summary)