Unions NSW & Ors v. State of New South Wales

Case No.

S204/2018

Case Information

Catchwords

Constitutional law – Implied freedom of political communication – Where plaintiffs assert intention to incur electoral expenditure during capped State expenditure period within meaning of Electoral Funding Act 2018 (NSW) – Where ss 29(1) and 35 of Act cap electoral expenditure by third-party campaigners – Whether s 29(10) and/or s 35 invalid because impermissibly burden implied freedom of political communication.

Short particulars

Documents

10/08/2018 Writ of summons

13/08/2018 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)

26/09/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)

19/10/2018 Special Case (Plaintiffs)

23/10/2018 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney)

24/10/2018 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)

26/10/2018 Chronology

14/11/2018 Written submissions (Defendant)

16/11/2018 Written submissions (University of New South Wales Grand Challenge to Inequality seeking leave to be heard as amicus curiae)

21/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

21/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)

21/11/2018 Written submissions (Liberal Party of Australia (NSW Division) seeking leave to intervene)

26/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)

26/11/2018 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)

28/11/2018 Reply (Plaintiffs)

05/12/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

05/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Plaintiffs)

05/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Defendant)

05/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)

06/12/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

06/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)

06/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)

06/12/2018 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)

29/01/2019 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Republic of Nauru v. WET040

Case No.

M154/2017

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

28/09/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Crulci J)

[2017] NRSC 79

Catchwords

Appeal - Refugees – Refugee Status Review Tribunal – Point of Law – Implausibility – Rational Basis or Evidentiary Foundation for Findings – Appeal allowed

Short particulars

Documents

13/10/2017 Notice of appeal

17/11/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)

17/11/2017 Chronology (Appellant)

22/08/2018 Written submissions (Refugee Legal as amicus curiae)

22/08/2018 Chronology (Refugee Legal as amicus curiae)

06/09/2018 Reply (Appellant)

26/10/2018 Reply (Refugee Legal as amicus curiae)

07/11/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

07/11/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)

07/11/2018 Outline of oral argument (Refugee Legal as amicus curiae)

07/11/2018 Reasons for judgment (Enlargement of time to appeal)

05/12/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Cases:

Date: 18 October 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 2h 58m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Cases:

Date: 17 October 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 4h 29m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

CaseGrajewski v. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)

Date: 12 October 2018

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 2h 00m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

 

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Page 103 of 259